










|
Book Review-II
Interpreting China’s Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future
Michael D.
Swaine and Ashley J. Tellis
Washington:
RAND, 2000.
Pages: 283.
n the
post-Mao period (1978 onwards), the new leadership of Deng Xiaoping
introduced drastic changes in Chinese foreign policy, de-radicalizing it
and opening it up towards the West. It also liberalized its economy, both
internally and externally, and adopted a fresh role in international
politics. The United States, which was engaged in its confrontation with
the USSR at that time, could not respond to China’s emerging role in the
international arena. No sooner did the Cold War end than Beijing appeared
as the new obsession of policy-makers in Washington who viewed its
phenomenal economic growth, increasing military power and expanding
political role as significant portents for the international power
structure.
Reacting to predictions that
China would continue its ascent as a world power, the US government
re-emphasized the need to develop strategic and successful policies toward
China.
Interpreting China’s Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future
certainly addresses that need and proposes certain recommendations for the
US government to counter China’s contemporary strategic options. RAND
scholars, Michael Swaine (Director of the Center for Asia-Pacific Policy),
and his fellow analyst, Ashley Tellis, have conducted the study;
it should, therefore, not take anybody by surprise that the book presents
American perceptions, or, more appropriately, its China obsession. The
authors term the defensive mindset of the Chinese–followed by China for
centuries–a ‘grand strategy’, with the ambition of gaining global
supremacy. It does not appear a sound argument, primarily because the
goals of all nations are modified with the passage of time and it is
difficult, if not impossible, for any nation to adhere to goals which were
set centuries ago.
Tracing the roots of China’s grand strategy (China’s basic approach to
political and military security), the authors identify them as the
achievement of interrelated objectives such as
preservation of internal order,
the wellbeing of its people, defence against external threats, and,
eventually, the attainment of geo-political influence as a major–perhaps
primary–state in international politics. The ruling authorities in
China have used all available methods to achieve these
objectives. In contemporary times, the achievement of these objectives has
continued to be the focal point of China’s security strategy.
It is interesting to note that no Chinese ruler has ever
presented the concept of this ‘grand strategy’ in a comprehensive manner.
This terminology is that of Swaine and Tellis, and they apply to the
evolving comprehensive national strength China has been acquiring.
In the modern era (from 1850 to the present times), colonial
powers reached the periphery of China, changing its threat perception. To
meet the new challenges, China first devised a hybrid ‘weak-strong’
security strategy and later modified it to a ‘calculative’ strategy. The
former contained the characteristics of both a weak and a strong state;
the latter was based on a shift from strict adherence to an ideology to
the liberalization of the economy, both internally and externally, opening
up towards the West and taking greater interest in international fora. The
‘calculative strategy’ also
emphasized increasing efforts to modernize
China’s military
for asymmetric gains. The authors suspect that, in the current phase,
China might well conflict with the United States and its allies on certain
issues, the most important of them being Beijing’s concern over
interference in its domestic affairs.
Assuming that the present trends in China’s long-term economic, military
and domestic political development continue, by the period 2015–2020 –the
minimum time-frame in which the Chinese economy and military might can
develop sufficiently to allow China to become globally pre-eminent–it
might begin an extended transition phase to a new security strategy that
would last for another couple of decades. However, attainment of this
goal, according to the authors, would largely depend on how China
consolidates its power capabilities vis-á-vis the other great
powers, particularly the US. At this stage, China could be reasonably
expected to demonstrate some, if not all, of the core elements the grand
strategies pursued by the major powers in the past: strengthening of
military powers; formation of alliances; redefining of the existing
international system to protect national interests; and, in the most
extreme policy choice imaginable, readiness to thwart pre-emptive war or
to launch predatory attacks on its foes.
The authors present a comprehensive plan of
strategic options for the US to contain China in either scenario: it
rises to power and acquires the associated assertiveness or
it fails in doing so. Should China acquire pre-eminent power, the authors
recommend that the United
States should adopt a policy of realistic engagement, combining efforts at
co-operation where possible; to prevent by force, if necessary, the
acquisition by China of capabilities that would threaten America’s core
national security interests; and to remain prepared to cope with the
consequences of a more assertive China. If
China does not acquire that status, owing to whatever
impediments may exist, and consequently remains unable to challenge the
US, then Washington’s strategy should be to neither create preconditions
for such a scenario nor retreat in the expectation that China’s rise to
power is inevitable.
Swaine and Tellis have undoubtedly made a major contribution to the
understanding of China’s current strategic behaviour at an appropriate
time, as Beijing is currently expanding its role in international
politics. It is not necessary that one agree with the policy
recommendations of the authors, but the book will certainly lead to wider
discussion, bringing new ideas and perspectives to the subject. It also
eliminates a certain level of obscurity regarding China’s role in the
future global politics. The book is worthwhile reading for the
researchers, students of international relations, political scientists and
policy-makers.
Ghulam Ali
Assistant Research Officer,
IPRI
|