










|
Book Review-5
Technological
Change and the Future of Warfare
Michael O’Hanlon,
Washington, D.C: The
Brookings Institute, 2000.
Pages 208
ichael O’Hanlon, Michael O’Hanlon is Senior Fellow in
Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institute. The book under review
examines the hypothesis of achievement of Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA)
in the near future and the possibility of re-evaluation of military
budgets, war fighting strategies and induction of modern arms in order to
pursue United States (US) policy objectives for its military. New
technologies and tactical/ operational innovations have the potential to
make important contributions to warfare by 2020. The book is divided into
eight chapters and each chapter contributes to the debate on RMA. The RMA
debate is important because the validity of its hypothesis would lead to
more productive and judicious utilization of US military resources and
serve its security interests in an economical way.
The author’s personal reservations for
the theory of RMA are quite visible. Some parts of the book may be
difficult to understand for an average reader who is not conversant with
the technical details and jargons regarding the issue.
The book advocates that high technology
has not always been such a central ingredient in US defence strategy,
which is contradictory to historical evidences. The end of World War-II
was the result of nuclear technology, which revolutionized the
battlefield. The vertical and horizontal arms race during the Cold War era
is further evidence of the use of high technology in US defence strategy.
The rapid mobilization of the US military in the Gulf War and its outcome
was the result of RMA. The contemporary issue of National Missile Defence
(NMD), and political support for this programme reflects the significance
of high technology.
The author discusses various schools of
thoughts in RMA. He used the references of “Joint Vision 2010,” a report
by Defence Secretary William Cohen. According to the report, the goals for
US military forces are, superior battlefield knowledge, full-dimensional
protection, dominant manoeuvre, and precision strike. The report includes
that in the 21st century, the US military will be able to find targets in
real time – any thing of consequence that moves upon or is located on
earth by Global Positioning System (GPS).
There are four basic schools of thought in RMA.
The first school of thought is the “System of System School,” which
focuses on the advancement in computers, communications, and networking to
make the functioning of existing weapons systems more effective. The
second one is “Dominant Battle Space Knowledge,” which accepts the
premises of the first school of thought as well as the sensors and
transparency in battlefield. The third one is “Global Reach, Global
Power,” school that supports the technological advancement to develop
lethal, agile and deployable weapons. It accepts the above mentioned
school of thoughts as well. The last one is “Vulnerability School,” which
desires the whole world to be benefited by RMA. On the other hand the US
needs to seek new military concepts to overcome the challenges to its
military supremacy and national security. The chronology of RMA, as given
in the book, is very interesting, and proves helpful in providing insights
into the evolution of the subject. The author argues that if RMA is
attainable, then it should be pursued pragmatically.
While discussing the technical details of the
subject, author frequently uses the jargon of physics to illustrate the
innate limitations of key military technologies. After analysing the
prospects of technological progress in the coming decades, the author
states that on the one hand, the role of computer is inevitable in the
future battlefields and on the other hand, there are important limitations
and vulnerabilities, which will remain in these technological spheres. He
analyses the mechanical, chemical, and structural technologies regarding
the subject. He also discusses the non-lethal and biological weapons and
defence systems against ballistic and cruise missile attacks containing
information about the trends in the types of technology and extrapolates
their future capabilities and uses. It makes futuristic assumptions about
warfare and battlefields. The most interesting part of the whole book is
where the author discusses three case studies, namely, Operation Desert
Storm, Kosovo 1999, and the Falklands War 1982, to support his arguments.
He argues that technological advancement cannot alter the importance of
traditional military tactics, but RMA can be helpful in achieving national
objectives.
There are interesting debates about the future need for overseas US
military bases, the future nature of multinational military operations and
the possibility of eliminating nuclear weapons world wide, as well as
reducing the vulnerability of US forces to Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).
RMA advocates belief that in case of RMA, the need for overseas military
bases will be reduced. Some advocates of RMA believe that the purpose of
RMA will be an American phenomenon, which would leave allies of the US in
the high-tech dust and make the conduct of combined military operations
difficult on a multinational basis. Another small group of RMA supporters
state that technological advancement would make it possible to eliminate
nuclear weapons from the face of the earth within decades, as well as
reduce the military’s vulnerabilities to chemical and biological
weapons.
The author has tried to formulate a strategy to
modernize the defence of the US while keeping in view the defence
strategies of other major powers. His major concern is the economic
compatibility between the defence strategies and the economy of the US. He
has stated that the US can devise a more affordable modern military
strategy by emphasizing on the electronics and computer advancement, which
offers new capabilities at modest cost.
The book provides opportunity for enhancing
knowledge about the new ideas/theories and their application to modern
warfare.
Asma Shakir Khawaja
Assistant Research Officer, IPRI
|