|
DOCUMENT No.
11
As Delivered
Introduction of draft UNMOVIC Work Programme, Security Council 19 March 2003
Executive Chairman Dr. Hans Blix
Mr. President
UNMOVIC was established by the Security Council resolution 1284
(1999) and was enabled to enter Iraq and carry out its inspection work almost
three years later.
It might seem strange that we are presenting a
draft work programme only after having already performed inspections for three
and a half months. However, there were good reasons why the Council wanted to
give us some time after the start of inspections to prepare this programme.
During the months of the build up of our resources in Iraq, Larnaca and New
York and of inspections in Iraq we have - as was indeed the purpose - learnt a
great deal that has been useful to know for the drafting of our work programme
and for the selection of key remaining disarmament tasks. It would have been
difficult to draft it without this knowledge and this practical experience.
The time lines established in resolution 1284
(1999) have been understood to mean that the work programme was to be
presented for the approval of the Council at the latest on 27 March. In order
to meet the wishes of members of the Council we made the Draft Work Programme
available already on Monday this week. I note that on the very same day we
were constrained together with other UN units to order the withdrawal of all
our inspectors and other international staff from Iraq.
I naturally feel sadness that three and a half
months of work carried out in Iraq have not brought the assurances needed
about the absence of weapons of mass destruction or other proscribed items in
Iraq, that no more time is available for our inspections and that armed action
now seems imminent.
At the same time I feel a sense of relief that it
was possible to withdraw yesterday all UN international staff, including that
of UNMOVIC and the IAEA. I note that the Iraqi authorities gave full
cooperation to achieve this and that our withdrawal to Larnaca took place in a
safe and orderly manner. Some sensitive equipment was also taken to Larnaca,
while other equipment was left and our offices in Baghdad have been sealed.
Some inspection staff will remain for a short time in Larnaca to prepare
inspection reports. Others who have come from our roster of trained staff,
will go home to their previous positions and could be available again, if the
need arises.
Mr. President,
I would like further to make some specific comments that relate
to the Draft Programme. I am aware of ideas which have been advanced that
specific groups of disarmament issues could be tackled and solved within
specific time lines. The programme does not propose such an approach, in
which, say, we would aim at addressing and resolving the issues of anthrax and
VX in March and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Remotely Piloted Vehicles
(RPVs) in April. In the work we pursued until now we worked broadly and did
not neglect any identified disarmament issues. However, it is evidently
possible for the Council to single out a few issues for resolution within a
specific time, just as the draft programme before you selects twelve key tasks
progress on which could have an impact on the Council's assessment of
cooperation of Iraq under resolution 1284 (1999). Whatever approach is
followed, results will depend on Iraq's active cooperation on substance.
May I add that in my last report I commented on
information provided by Iraq on a number of unresolved issues. Since then,
Iraq has sent several more letters on such issues. These efforts by Iraq
should be acknowledged, but, as I noted in this Council on 7 March the value
of the information thus provided must be soberly judged. Our experts have
found so far that in substance only limited new information has been provided
that will help to resolve remaining questions.
Mr. President,
Under resolution 1284 (1999) UNMOVIC's work programme is to be
submitted to the Council for approval. I note, however, that what was drafted
and prepared for implementation by a large staff of UNMOVIC inspectors and
other resources deployed in Iraq, would seem to have only limited practical
relevance in the current situation.
UNMOVIC is a subsidiary organ of the Security
Council. Until the Council takes a new decision regarding the role and
functions of the Commission, the previous resolutions remain valid to the
extent this is practicable. It is evidently for the Council to consider the
next steps.
In its further deliberations I hope the Council
will be aware that it has in UNMOVIC staff a unique body of international
experts who owe their allegiance to the United Nations, and who are trained as
inspectors in the field of weapons of mass destruction. While the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has a large department of skilled
nuclear inspectors and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW) has a large staff of skilled chemical weapons inspectors, no
other international organizations have trained inspectors in the field of
biological weapons and missiles. There is also in the secretariat of UNMOVIC
staff familiar with and trained in the analysis, both of discipline specific
issues and in the broad questions of proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction. With increasing attention being devoted to the proliferation of
these weapons this capability may be valuable to the Council.
I thank you, Mr. President.
<http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/blix19mar.html>
|