|
|
WHAT HAPPENED TO AMERICAN
COMPASSION Mariya Noor
On 27 June 2001, US ambassador designate to Pakistan, Mrs. Wendy Chamberlin,
appeared before the South Asian Affairs sub-committee of the US Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, for nomination hearing. The Sub-Committee was chaired
by Senator Paul Wellstone (Democrat). The hearing exposed American views and
perceptions about Pakistan which are held and expressed at higher political
levels, which putting very mildly were highly disturbing, not only in contents
but also in quality. The American tilt towards India was quite obvious.
Pakistanis do not grudge this American preference, which is solely dominated
by economic gains, although one does wonder if the American people have not
forgotten the values and lofty ideals of their founding fathers? Today's Americans
particularly their political leadership are too deeply involved in narrow
goals and personal profit and are easily influenced by sponsored lobbies and
allow themselves to get misguided by vested media campaign and propaganda.
It is unfortunate that the most powerful and a highly liberal nation with
faith in abiding human values has become captive to a small influential minority
which so brazenly practices in oppression, injustice and brutalities and yet
remains America's darling!
Similar distortion is clearly visible in Senator Wellstone's remarks, accusing
Pakistan for 'mistreatment of refugees from Afghanistan, refugees fleeing
not only from drought but the cruelty of the Taliban regime that Pakistan
itself helps maintain in power'. To say that the remarks are incorrect would
be a gross understatement. The Senator knows, how Pakistan had taken care
of more than 3.3 million Afghan refugees at the height of Afghan Jihad, which
ironically now has become Afghan terrorism! Even today, 1.8 million Afghan
refugees are located on Pakistani territory despite severe economic problems
faced by Pakistan. Have the Americans ever taken such large number of refugees
to the U.S.? Doling out financial aid in dollars is one thing and sharing
the real social and economic hardships and problems of the Afghan refugees,
another. In all honesty the Afghans do not flee from Afghanistan due to Taliban
cruelty but from the extreme economic hardships caused by the nature as well
as the attritions of war and deplorably the UN sanctions. For the unjust treatment
being given to the Afghan people by the West for their immense sacrifices,
it blames Taliban and Pakistan. Talibans are not a pleasant factor in Afghan
situation nor are the northern renegades. But should the innocent people be
punished for it?
Thank you, Senator for being honest about defining American relationship with
Pakistan now on its own merits. Should it mean that our 54 years long relationship
was not based on merits and was merely an American exploitation? Does it mean
that from containment of the Communists to recognition of China and fighting
the Soviet aggression in Afghanistan were wasted years and efforts? Can supremacy
of national interests be so shamelessly without loyalty?
It is paradoxical that the American ruling elite worry over much, about Pakistan's
internal affairs with fanciful terminology; i.e. human rights, democracy,
non-proliferation etc without showing any concern for the same in the oppressive
Arab monarchies and dictatorships and their darling state. For how long would
they follow this double standards? Other American concerns relate to terrorism
and drug. Here too, Americans seem unfair with Pakistan, when they without
justification assume that Pakistanis could facilitate surrender of Osama bin
Laden and prevent poppy cultivation in Afghanistan. They must have been surprised
to learn that merely through an edict, the Taliban leadership banned poppy
cultivation and the edict was obeyed in letter and spirit. Do they know that
today the Afghans are a deweaponized society? Admittedly, Taliban edicts against
social and moral crimes are very harsh and their religiosity and backwardness
even more unbearable, but what else should be expected from an Afghan generation
which has grown from one of the most cruel wars, with no education and severe
social and economic deprivations? They can be reformed through sympathy and
support and not pressures and sanctions. It is time the Americans understood
the Afghan situation with some pragmatism and stop blaming Pakistan for their
own failures to shoulder responsibilities as the only super power.
The greatness that they are blessed with should shine with Christian justice
and compassion and must not get corrupted from Jewish arrogance.
On 27 June 2001, US ambassador designate to Pakistan, Mrs. Wendy Chamberlin,
appeared before the South Asian Affairs sub-committee of the US Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, for nomination hearing. The Sub-Committee was chaired
by Senator Paul Wellstone (Democrat). The hearing exposed American views and
perceptions about Pakistan which are held and expressed at higher political
levels, which putting very mildly were highly disturbing, not only in contents
but also in quality. The American tilt towards India was quite obvious.
Pakistanis do not grudge this American preference, which is solely dominated
by economic gains, although one does wonder if the American people have not
forgotten the values and lofty ideals of their founding fathers? Today's Americans
particularly their political leadership are too deeply involved in narrow
goals and personal profit and are easily influenced by sponsored lobbies and
allow themselves to get misguided by vested media campaign and propaganda.
It is unfortunate that the most powerful and a highly liberal nation with
faith in abiding human values has become captive to a small influential minority
which so brazenly practices in oppression, injustice and brutalities and yet
remains America's darling!
Similar distortion is clearly visible in Senator Wellstone's remarks, accusing
Pakistan for 'mistreatment of refugees from Afghanistan, refugees fleeing
not only from drought but the cruelty of the Taliban regime that Pakistan
itself helps maintain in power'. To say that the remarks are incorrect would
be a gross understatement. The Senator knows, how Pakistan had taken care
of more than 3.3 million Afghan refugees at the height of Afghan Jihad, which
ironically now has become Afghan terrorism! Even today, 1.8 million Afghan
refugees are located on Pakistani territory despite severe economic problems
faced by Pakistan. Have the Americans ever taken such large number of refugees
to the U.S.? Doling out financial aid in dollars is one thing and sharing
the real social and economic hardships and problems of the Afghan refugees,
another. In all honesty the Afghans do not flee from Afghanistan due to Taliban
cruelty but from the extreme economic hardships caused by the nature as well
as the attritions of war and deplorably the UN sanctions. For the unjust treatment
being given to the Afghan people by the West for their immense sacrifices,
it blames Taliban and Pakistan. Talibans are not a pleasant factor in Afghan
situation nor are the northern renegades. But should the innocent people be
punished for it?
Thank you, Senator for being honest about defining American relationship with
Pakistan now on its own merits. Should it mean that our 54 years long relationship
was not based on merits and was merely an American exploitation? Does it mean
that from containment of the Communists to recognition of China and fighting
the Soviet aggression in Afghanistan were wasted years and efforts? Can supremacy
of national interests be so shamelessly without loyalty?
It is paradoxical that the American ruling elite worry over much, about Pakistan's
internal affairs with fanciful terminology; i.e. human rights, democracy,
non-proliferation etc without showing any concern for the same in the oppressive
Arab monarchies and dictatorships and their darling state. For how long would
they follow this double standards? Other American concerns relate to terrorism
and drug. Here too, Americans seem unfair with Pakistan, when they without
justification assume that Pakistanis could facilitate surrender of Osama bin
Laden and prevent poppy cultivation in Afghanistan. They must have been surprised
to learn that merely through an edict, the Taliban leadership banned poppy
cultivation and the edict was obeyed in letter and spirit. Do they know that
today the Afghans are a deweaponized society? Admittedly, Taliban edicts against
social and moral crimes are very harsh and their religiosity and backwardness
even more unbearable, but what else should be expected from an Afghan generation
which has grown from one of the most cruel wars, with no education and severe
social and economic deprivations? They can be reformed through sympathy and
support and not pressures and sanctions. It is time the Americans understood
the Afghan situation with some pragmatism and stop blaming Pakistan for their
own failures to shoulder responsibilities as the only super power.
The greatness that they are blessed with should shine with Christian justice
and compassion and must not get corrupted from Jewish arrogance.
|
|