|
|
Politicising the Olympic
Games
The POST,
Sun, Apr,27, 2008.
Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema
Ever since the Olympic torch has been handed over to the concerned Chinese
officials in Athens ceremony, it has been passing through many countries. In
some countries, protests have been organized by the pro-Tibetan groups either
independently or in close congruence with other local activists. In some cases
the protests were the product of genuine sympathizers of Tibetan people but
the large number of protests were the product of more anti-Chinese lobby than
being reflective of great sympathy for the plight of the Tibetan people.
Since it started its journey, the torch has passed through many countries. In
some countries, the arrangements to allow the torch pass through peacefully
were better than in some others. In some countries there was hardly any
protest, while in some others there were relatively visible and they managed
to occupy prominent places in the local newspapers.
In fact even in those countries where the protesters were no more than few
dozens, the reports published generated the impression that it was really a
major protest. Apart from few western countries where protests were relatively
larger, the Olympic torch seemed to have passed through the chosen countries
without any noticeable incident. The countries like UK, USA and France seemed
to have experienced noticeable protests rallies.
The Olympics are symbol of peace and harmony. The games in each Olympic
gathering reminds of certain universal human values. Every participating
athlete struggles for excellence and after the games are over, he/she is
enriched with experiences which continue to be narrated for years. Not only
the athletes recognize the ultimate competition but learn and enjoy from the
experience.
Protest is part of the human rights which almost every nation bestows on its
citizens.
It is an expression of discontentment. However most of such protests are of
peaceful nature. Occasionally these protests take an ugly turn primarily
because of mishandling by the law enforcing agencies or unwanted acts of some
miscreants who join many protests with ulterior motives.
Minor clashes took place between the protesters and the police when the
Olympic torch was passing thought countries like France and Britain. Most of
the protests were the focusing on the recent developments that have taken
place in Tibet. China has faced international criticism over its policy
pursuits regarding anti-Chinese protests in Tibet that started on March 10,
2008 in Tibet’s capital city Lasha.
Most observers believe that protests against Chinese recent crackdown in Lasha
are product of two distinct factors; total ignorance or ulterior motives. Many
in the West are somewhat ignorant of the situation in Tibet. However their
dislike for China’s peaceful rise is well known to every concerned individual.
One does not have to discuss in detail that many in the West are dedicatedly
engaged in proving total failure of communism. But the peaceful rise and
galloping economy of the China is likely to prove something totally different.
The efforts that have been and are still, in many ways, undertaken to
discredit communist system are continuing until the attainment of its ultimate
goal. While the economic situation of other remaining communists states are
not all that impressive, the economic progress in China is indeed very
impressive. For decades the growth rate in China has been touching 10%. Many
in the west think if China can sustain this growth rate for another decade, it
economy is going to surpass many western countries.
While the dislike for the communist system was projected almost regularly by
many in the west, their frustrations have been accumulating over the
impressive Chinese growth rate and consequential strengthening of their
economy. Further frustrations stemmed from Chinese successful incorporation of
both Hong Kong and Macao. The Chinese have been able to handle most of the
tricky problems that confronted them over the years.
There are only two areas where the Chinese are subjected to some kind of
criticism; the East Turkmenistan Movement and Tibet. While there is no doubt
that both are internal matters and outsiders should refrain from interfering
in the internal matters of China, those who intensely dislike Chinese system
are unlikely to refrain from interference in internal matters.
The recent resolutions of the US Congress and European parliament urge China
to stop repression in Tibet, release the non-violent Tibetan protesters and
have a dialogue with Dalai Lama. It seem pertinent to mention that the people
of Kashmir have been suffering from the repressive measures and the operative
black laws, but neither the European parliament nor the US Congress deem fit
to pass similar censure. This clearly exposes the biased attitude of the
western countries against China. In addition, the rights of Palestinian people
have never been treated at par with those of Tibetan especially by the
guardians of human rights in the west.
Having exhausted all avenues, many in the west have been dwelling heavily upon
politicizing Olympic Games primarily because these are being held in China.
According to China Daily the plan to organize worldwide protests against
Beijing Olympics were finalized sometimes in the middle of 2007 in an
International Tibet Support Groups Conference in Europe. It is also alleged
that the plans were developed with collaboration of the US state department
and Tibetan government in exile.
The international gathering ended with a ‘plan of action’ entitled Roadmap for
Tibet Movement for the Coming Years. Four areas of interest were included in
the plan; political support for negotiations, human rights, environment and
development and ‘the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing’. Given these reports there
is no doubt that the most of the protests were organized with ulterior motives
by those who are less moved by human sufferings than by their own designs. If
there are genuine sympathizers for oppressed people all over the world, then
it is indeed difficult to ignore the plight and sufferings of the people of
Kashmir.
The writer works for Islamabad Policy research Institute.
|
|