|
|
Politics
of Nuclear Proliferation
Faisal Saeed Cheema
The politics of proliferation has been significantly debated in the international
politics since the introduction of nuclear weapons in 1945. The recurrent
questions of the debate has been like who is responsible for the proliferation
of nuclear weapons? What are the considerations for going nuclear? And how
the proliferation of the weapons can be countered? The answer to these questions
is that states acquire nuclear weapons due to different reasons like the security
consideration, domestic politics, inefficacy of the non-proliferation regime,
conventional weapons asymmetry, lack of extended deterrence, the importance
of the nuclear weapons in the international politics and, in some cases to
fulfil the regional hegemonic ambitions. The above-mentioned contours of proliferation
fluctuate from country to country and from region to region and this article
would try to analyse the above-mentioned factors of nuclear proliferation.
First, the most important factor for acquiring nuclear weapons is the security
concerns. The most relevant example in this context is Pakistan, which acquired
nuclear weapons to balance the Indian threat. The nuclear weapons have deterred
India from attacking after the revealed nuclear capabilities of Pakistan.
Furthermore, we have seen that the introduction of nuclear weapons has averted
the outbreak of any major war in the South Asian region.
Second, the prestige factor is also equally responsible for the proliferation
of weapons. The USA detonated the nuclear device after the end of World War
II. The main purpose seemed to the ascendancy in the new international political
system in post war scenario. If we recall the situation in the Second World
War, we see that Germany was already overwhelmed and Japan was on the verge
of collapse when the USA dropped atom bomb upon them. The USA at that time
hunted to be the only power in the world affairs after the collapse of European
powers in the World War II. So in case of the United States the main objective
for the acquisition of nuclear weapons was the desire to be a leading power
in the international system. The second state, which joined the nuclear club,
was the former Soviet Union in 1949. The consideration for acquiring the bomb
was also to achieve great power status in the international political system.
At the time, the Soviets were without any threat to there national security.
The only purpose was to achieve equivalence with the USA. The third and the
fourth states to join the nuclear club were Great Britain and France in 1952
and 1964 respectively. Both these states were also keen to acquire the prestigious
position in the comity of nations. England was without any threat and was
under the security umbrella of the USA. The fifth state to join the nuclear
club was Peoples Republic of China in 1964. The reasons for the acquisition
of weapons were stemmed partially from the security considerations and partially
from the prestige factor in inter state relations. After the nuclear explosions,
Chinese beefed up there security against any threat.
Third, another factor of nuclear proliferation is the aspiration for regional
hegemony. In this context, the most appropriate example is of India, which
detonated its so-called peaceful nuclear explosion in 1974. Although this
was described as a peaceful nuclear explosion, but this also provided the
foundation for the Indian nuclear programme. In May 1998, India overtly crossed
the nuclear threshold. The reasons for the nuclear explosions were multifarious.
The most significant factor was the aspiration of great power status. The
timing of the explosions is the evidence in hand. In May 1998, India was without
any threat and was enjoying good relations with China. As far as Pakistan
is concerned, India had no threat at that time. Besides the prestige factor,
domestic politics was also vital. The BJP government wanted to earn political
electoral fallout from the tests.
Fourth, the inefficacy of the non-proliferation regime is another cause of
nuclear proliferation. The non-proliferation introduced by the superpowers
was based upon the double standard and was discriminatory. The non-proliferation
regime made it mandatory upon the nuclear states not to make available nuclear
technology to the no-nuclear weapon states while at the same time the nuclear
weapon states can exchange nuclear technologies among themselves. These type
of policies by the superpowers proved counter productive and non-nuclear weapon
states sought nuclear technologies to get membership of the prestigious club
of nuclear weapons.
Fifth, another factor for the spread of nuclear weapons is the asymmetrical
balance of conventional weapons. The states, which are weak conventionally,
seek nuclear weapons to equalize with the adversary. The classic example of
this scenario is the case of India and Pakistan. India is stronger than Pakistan
in conventional weapons and Pakistan has acquired nuclear weapons to meet
Indian aggression.
The proliferation of nuclear weapons has been resulted from the discriminatory
policies of the great powers coupled with aspiration for great power status.
Furthermore, different threat perception and resulted security needs of the
different countries has accentuated the spread of nuclear weapons.
|
|