|
|
Is India fuelling militancy in
Fata?
The POST,
Sun, Aug,03, 2008.
Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema
A report recently published in a leading national daily (The Nation) on 27th
July unambiguously stated that after receiving intelligence reports indicating
links between RAW (Research and Analysis Wing) and militant organizations
nation’s top security brass has ordered a thorough probe into the involvement
of India in the growing militancy in Waziristan and other tribal areas.
Not only the intelligence reports show the involvement of India’s main spy
agency RAW in fomenting anti-Pakistan feelings there but also the information
extracted from the arrested militants during Hangu operation also supported
the contention. While the source stressed that the reports were credible
enough to be accepted, it was decided to have a joint probe involving
country’s main security agencies in order to ascertain the nature and
cooperation between the militants and Indian spy agency.
While RAW is commonly known to dabble into nefarious acts inside Pakistan, yet
it not appropriate to put the blame on RAW unless a definite and convincing
proof is provided by the above mentioned probe. To put the blame just like
that is no different than what the Indian have been doing so regularly and so
consistently after any adverse event that had taken place inside India only to
realize that those were undertaken by the Indians or India based groups.
Admittedly there exist sufficient circumstantial evidences to point a finger
at the Indian agency and past, both recent and distant, is studded with
innumerable instances in which RAW was known to be involved. Compared to
India, Pakistan has never indulged in the blame game unless it has some
evidence where as Indian practice has been to put the blame first and then try
to either collect the evidence or manufacture it.
It needs to be mentioned here that lately even the Afghan government is
demonstrating the techniques it learnt from India. Following the recent Kabul
bomb blast in the Indian embassy, the Afghan officials including the President
whose writ is known to be confined to Kabul, in their indecent haste did not
hesitate to quickly pin the blame on Pakistan based agency without advancing
any evidence.
Many eminent non Pakistani scholars who are familiar with the complex nature
of the area have written about Taliban stressed that not only the US
intelligence community is well aware about this problem which is exacerbated
by Taliban alliance with Al Qaeda moving into Pakistani territories but also
because of covert support by the Indian government and its intelligence
services-principally RAW for the Jihadist movement.
A cursory review of India-Pakistan relations over the last sixty years clearly
point towards the fact that both countries’ intelligence agencies have been
exploiting situations in one form or the other with one major difference
between them. The Indian agencies would immediately point the finger at
Pakistan almost immediately after the incident whereas the Pakistanis would
first search for some piece of evidence and then build the case against India.
Being a large country and having a large network of intelligence agencies with
close connections with agencies Israeli Mossad, the Indian agencies also
operate from Afghanistan with the active support of the incumbent Afghan
government.
It is not too far fetched to assume that the American intelligence agencies
are well aware of RAW’s activities in the region especially in Afghanistan,
yet they have opted to avoid criticizing their activities against Pakistan.
Again no Pakistani would be agitated as they are well familiar about India’s
over projection of the notion of cross border terrorism with regard to Kashmir
situation and the American ready acceptance of Indian interpretation of the
Kashmir situation.
Pakistan appears to be easily available punching bag which not only the
Indians and Afghans but even the Americans do not hesitate to throw punches.
However compared to the Indians and Afghans, the Americans appear to be
relatively sophisticated in their approach. The Afghans and Indians throw
punches at will.
The American problem is that they do not want to annoy India and at the same
time would like to have Pakistan on their right side. Not only they have been
building India at the cost of even destroying NPT regime but also feel
convinced that a strong India would be able to counter the increasing Chinese
influence in Asia. Admittedly India is advancing at a much rapid pace in terms
of development but to play the role of a regional influential it may have to
demonstrate qualities deemed necessary for a great power’s role.
A further complicating factor is the American commitment to Afghanistan.
Judged by any yardstick the Americans along with NATO forces have not yet been
able to extend incumbent Afghan regime’s writ beyond a limited area. The
foreign forces have certain met limited success. Undoubtedly it appears that
foreign forces may have to stay for a much longer time than what they
initially anticipated.
Unable to deliver the augured outcome, one finds that the notion of do more is
frequently aired. Most objective analyses invariably concluded that the notion
of do more is part of the diversionary tactics. Inability to keep pace with
anticipated outcomes often compels them to employ such tactics to buy time.
However this does not mean that both the Taliban and Al Qaeda have not been
illegally using parts of Tribal areas. In fact the illegal use of Pakistani
Tribal territory has caused many undesired problems for Pakistan. The
Pakistani government is making efforts to stamp out the militancy and to plug
the illegal cross border movements in the Pak-Afghan border region.
In this connection, the Americans should not only provide necessary help to
government of Pakistan and strengthen its hands to deal with the problem
effectively but should also effective prevent the Indians and the Afghans
support to the militants in the tribal areas.
The writer works for Islamabad Policy research Institute.
|
|